On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 09:01:17PM +0000, Nicholas Wright wrote: > Hi > > Re: 128MB minimum memory - JBuilder was a big application on Windows... what > makes you think it would be smaller written in Java? Actually JBuilder Foundation is more efficient than the previous versions because we had to deal with Java code (designer,palette, compiler and others) interfacing Delphi code (editor, IDE menu etc). With Foundation we don't have to have the JVM and the Delphi RTL in memory at the same time, one single heap is better. -- Paolo Ciccone JBuilder dev.team ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Brian Pomerantz
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Syam_Kumar_Abburi
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nicholas Wright
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise kornel c
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise kornel c
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise noisebrain
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Paolo Ciccone
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise kornel c
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise Nathan Meyers
- Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise kornel c