Hi Esra, You are *still* incorrectly referring to the glyph with three dots over it:
On 05/02/2008 at 12:18 PM, esra wrote: > yes the correct one is "ژ "/"ze"/U+632. "ژ" is *not* "ze"/U+632 - it is "zhe"/U+698. Have you increased the font size? Can you see the difference between these two?: "ژ"/"zhe"/U+698 "ز"/"ze"/U+632 > my problem is when i do search for "د-ژ" range. The result > is "ساب ووفر" and this word's first letter is "س" and it's unicode is > "U+633" and it is not in the in the [ U+062F - U+0632 ] range. Like I keep saying, in the above description, you're using the glyph "ژ"/"zhe"/U+698, while calling at the same time incorrectly referring to it as "ze"/U+632. I don't mean to continually bang on about this - if you're *sure* that when you search, you're using the character represented by the glyph with one dot (and not three), i.e. "ز"/"ze"/U+632, then the problem lies elsewhere. Steve On 05/02/2008 at 12:18 PM, esra wrote: > yes the correct one is "ژ "/"ze"/U+632. > > my problem is when i do search for " د-ژ" range. The result > is ""ساب ووفر > " and this word's first letter is "س " and it's unicode is > "U+633" and it > is not in the in the [ U+062F - U+0632 ] range. > > am i wrong? > > Esra > > Steven A Rowe wrote: > > > > Hi Esra, > > > > I still think you're wrong :). > > > > On 05/02/2008 at 9:31 AM, esra wrote: > > > > ژ = U+632 > > > > According to the website you linked to, the above character, which has > > three dots over it, is named "zhe", and its Unicode code point is > > U+698. (I had to increase the font size to see the three dots.) > > > > I think you are confusing "ژ"/"zhe"/U+698 with the letter > > "ز"/"ze"/U+632, which has just one dot over it. > > > > Unless you were mistaken in all of your emails when you included the > > character "ژ"/"zhe" instead of "ز"/"ze", then what I said in my > > previous email still stands: there is no problem here. > > > > Steve > > > > On 05/02/2008 at 9:31 AM, esra wrote: > > > > > > Hi Steven, > > > > > > sorry i made a mistake. unicodes are like this: > > > > > > > د=U+62F > > > > ژ = U+632 > > > > and the first letter of "ساب ووفر " is س = U+633 > > > > > > you can also check them here > > > > http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/persian-alphabet.html > > > > > > Esra > > > > > > > > > Steven A Rowe wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Esra, > > > > > > > > Going back to the original problem statement, I see something that > > > > looks illogical to me - please correct me if I'm wrong: > > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:21 AM, esra wrote: > > > > > i am using lucene's "IndexSearcher" to search the given xml by > > > > > keyword which contains farsi information. > > > > > while searching i use ranges like > > > > > > > > > > آ-ث | ج-خ | د-ژ | س-ظ | ع-ق | ک-ل | م-ی > > > > > > > > > > when i do search for "د-ژ" range the results are wrong , they > > > > > are the results of " س-ظ "range. > > > > > > > > > > for example when i do search for "د-ژ" one of the the results is > > > > > "ساب ووفر", this result also shown on the " س-ظ " range's result > > > > > list which is the corret range. > > > > > > > > > > As IndexSearcher use "compareTo" method and this method uses > > > > > unicodes for comparing, i found the unicodes of the characters. > > > > > > > > > > د=U+62F > > > > > ژ = U+698 > > > > > and the first letter of "ساب ووفر " is س = U+633 > > > > > > > > It appears to me that *both* the "د-ژ" range [ U+062F - U+0698 ] and > > > > the "س-ظ" range [ U+0633 - U+0638 ] contain the first letter of "ساب > > > > ووفر", which is "س" = U+0633. > > > > > > > > You stated that U+0633 should be contained in the [ U+0633 - U+0638 ] > > > > range - I agree - but why do you think U+0633 should not be contained > > > > in the [ U+062F - U+0698 ] range? > > > > > > > > In other words, it looks to me like your problem is not a problem at > > > > all. > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: > > > > http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-tp16977096p17019498 .html Sent > > from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To > > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-tp16977096p17022861.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
