Hi Esra, I have created an issue for this - see <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1279>.
I'll try to take a crack at a patch this weekend. Steve On 05/02/2008 at 12:55 PM, esra wrote: > > Hi Steven , > > yes you are right, sorry i am a bit confused. > > i checked again and the correct one is "zhe"/U+698. > > It seems the word is in the range but my customer says it > shouldn't be. > > I think problem occurs because "zhe" is a Persian letter > outside the Arabic > alphabet. In farsi alphabet this letter is not after the "س" > letter but it's > unicode is bigger than "س" letter's and the searcher works > with unicodes. > > Esra > > > Steven A Rowe wrote: > > > > Hi Esra, > > > > You are *still* incorrectly referring to the glyph with three dots over > > it: > > > > On 05/02/2008 at 12:18 PM, esra wrote: > > > yes the correct one is "ژ "/"ze"/U+632. > > > > "ژ" is *not* "ze"/U+632 - it is "zhe"/U+698. > > > > Have you increased the font size? Can you see the difference between > > these two?: > > > > "ژ"/"zhe"/U+698 > > "ز"/"ze"/U+632 > > > > > my problem is when i do search for "د-ژ" range. The result is "ساب > > > ووفر" and this word's first letter is "س" and it's unicode is "U+633" > > > and it is not in the in the [ U+062F - U+0632 ] range. > > > > Like I keep saying, in the above description, you're using the glyph > > "ژ"/"zhe"/U+698, while calling at the same time incorrectly referring > > to it as "ze"/U+632. > > > > I don't mean to continually bang on about this - if you're *sure* that > > when you search, you're using the character represented by the glyph > > with one dot (and not three), i.e. "ز"/"ze"/U+632, then the problem > > lies elsewhere. > > > > Steve > > > > On 05/02/2008 at 12:18 PM, esra wrote: > > > yes the correct one is "ژ "/"ze"/U+632. > > > > > > my problem is when i do search for " د-ژ" range. The result > > > is ""ساب ووفر > > > " and this word's first letter is "س " and it's unicode is > > > "U+633" and it > > > is not in the in the [ U+062F - U+0632 ] range. > > > > > > am i wrong? > > > > > > Esra > > > > > > Steven A Rowe wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Esra, > > > > > > > > I still think you're wrong :). > > > > > > > > On 05/02/2008 at 9:31 AM, esra wrote: > > > > > > ژ = U+632 > > > > > > > > According to the website you linked to, the above character, which > > > > has three dots over it, is named "zhe", and its Unicode code point is > > > > U+698. (I had to increase the font size to see the three dots.) > > > > > > > > I think you are confusing "ژ"/"zhe"/U+698 with the letter > > > > "ز"/"ze"/U+632, which has just one dot over it. > > > > > > > > Unless you were mistaken in all of your emails when you included the > > > > character "ژ"/"zhe" instead of "ز"/"ze", then what I said in my > > > > previous email still stands: there is no problem here. > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > On 05/02/2008 at 9:31 AM, esra wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi Steven, > > > > > > > > > > sorry i made a mistake. unicodes are like this: > > > > > > > > > > > د=U+62F > > > > > > ژ = U+632 > > > > > > and the first letter of "ساب ووفر " is س = U+633 > > > > > > > > > > you can also check them here > > > > > > > http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/persian-alphabet.html > > > > > > > > > > Esra > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Steven A Rowe wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Esra, > > > > > > > > > > > > Going back to the original problem statement, I see something that > > > > > > looks illogical to me - please correct me if I'm wrong: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:21 AM, esra wrote: > > > > > > > i am using lucene's "IndexSearcher" to search the given xml by > > > > > > > keyword which contains farsi information. while searching i use > > > > > > > ranges like > > > > > > > > > > > > > > آ-ث | ج-خ | د-ژ | س-ظ | ع-ق | ک-ل | م-ی > > > > > > > > > > > > > > when i do search for "د-ژ" range the results are wrong , they > > > > > > > are the results of " س-ظ "range. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > for example when i do search for "د-ژ" one of the the results is > > > > > > > "ساب ووفر", this result also shown on the " س-ظ " range's result > > > > > > > list which is the corret range. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > As IndexSearcher use "compareTo" method and this method uses > > > > > > > unicodes for comparing, i found the unicodes of the characters. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > د=U+62F > > > > > > > ژ = U+698 > > > > > > > and the first letter of "ساب ووفر " is س = U+633 > > > > > > > > > > > > It appears to me that *both* the "د-ژ" range [ > U+062F - U+0698 ] > > > and > > > > > > the "س-ظ" range [ U+0633 - U+0638 ] contain the > first letter of > > > "ساب > > > > > > ووفر", which is "س" = U+0633. > > > > > > > > > > > > You stated that U+0633 should be contained in the [ > U+0633 - U+0638 > > > ] > > > > > > range - I agree - but why do you think U+0633 should not be > > > > > > contained in the [ U+062F - U+0698 ] range? > > > > > > > > > > > > In other words, it looks to me like your problem is > not a problem > > > at > > > > > > all. > > > > > > > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: > > > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-tp16977096p17019498 > > > .html Sent > > > > from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To > > > > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > > > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-tp16977096p17022861.html > > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > -- View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-tp16977096p17023557.html Sent > from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >