Hi Steven, thanks for your help....
Esra Steven A Rowe wrote: > > Hi Esra, > > I have created an issue for this - see > <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1279>. > > I'll try to take a crack at a patch this weekend. > > Steve > > On 05/02/2008 at 12:55 PM, esra wrote: >> >> Hi Steven , >> >> yes you are right, sorry i am a bit confused. >> >> i checked again and the correct one is "zhe"/U+698. >> >> It seems the word is in the range but my customer says it >> shouldn't be. >> >> I think problem occurs because "zhe" is a Persian letter >> outside the Arabic >> alphabet. In farsi alphabet this letter is not after the "س" >> letter but it's >> unicode is bigger than "س" letter's and the searcher works >> with unicodes. >> >> Esra >> >> >> Steven A Rowe wrote: >> > >> > Hi Esra, >> > >> > You are *still* incorrectly referring to the glyph with three dots over >> > it: >> > >> > On 05/02/2008 at 12:18 PM, esra wrote: >> > > yes the correct one is "ژ "/"ze"/U+632. >> > >> > "ژ" is *not* "ze"/U+632 - it is "zhe"/U+698. >> > >> > Have you increased the font size? Can you see the difference between >> > these two?: >> > >> > "ژ"/"zhe"/U+698 >> > "ز"/"ze"/U+632 >> > >> > > my problem is when i do search for "د-ژ" range. The result is "ساب >> > > ووفر" and this word's first letter is "س" and it's unicode is "U+633" >> > > and it is not in the in the [ U+062F - U+0632 ] range. >> > >> > Like I keep saying, in the above description, you're using the glyph >> > "ژ"/"zhe"/U+698, while calling at the same time incorrectly referring >> > to it as "ze"/U+632. >> > >> > I don't mean to continually bang on about this - if you're *sure* that >> > when you search, you're using the character represented by the glyph >> > with one dot (and not three), i.e. "ز"/"ze"/U+632, then the problem >> > lies elsewhere. >> > >> > Steve >> > >> > On 05/02/2008 at 12:18 PM, esra wrote: >> > > yes the correct one is "ژ "/"ze"/U+632. >> > > >> > > my problem is when i do search for " د-ژ" range. The result >> > > is ""ساب ووفر >> > > " and this word's first letter is "س " and it's unicode is >> > > "U+633" and it >> > > is not in the in the [ U+062F - U+0632 ] range. >> > > >> > > am i wrong? >> > > >> > > Esra >> > > >> > > Steven A Rowe wrote: >> > > > >> > > > Hi Esra, >> > > > >> > > > I still think you're wrong :). >> > > > >> > > > On 05/02/2008 at 9:31 AM, esra wrote: >> > > > > > ژ = U+632 >> > > > >> > > > According to the website you linked to, the above character, which >> > > > has three dots over it, is named "zhe", and its Unicode code point >> is >> > > > U+698. (I had to increase the font size to see the three dots.) >> > > > >> > > > I think you are confusing "ژ"/"zhe"/U+698 with the letter >> > > > "ز"/"ze"/U+632, which has just one dot over it. >> > > > >> > > > Unless you were mistaken in all of your emails when you included >> the >> > > > character "ژ"/"zhe" instead of "ز"/"ze", then what I said in my >> > > > previous email still stands: there is no problem here. >> > > > >> > > > Steve >> > > > >> > > > On 05/02/2008 at 9:31 AM, esra wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > Hi Steven, >> > > > > >> > > > > sorry i made a mistake. unicodes are like this: >> > > > > >> > > > > > د=U+62F >> > > > > > ژ = U+632 >> > > > > > and the first letter of "ساب ووفر " is س = U+633 >> > > > > >> > > > > you can also check them here >> > > > > > >> http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nhtcapri/persian-alphabet.html >> > > > > >> > > > > Esra >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > Steven A Rowe wrote: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Hi Esra, >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Going back to the original problem statement, I see something >> that >> > > > > > looks illogical to me - please correct me if I'm wrong: >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On Apr 30, 2008, at 3:21 AM, esra wrote: >> > > > > > > i am using lucene's "IndexSearcher" to search the given xml >> by >> > > > > > > keyword which contains farsi information. while searching i >> use >> > > > > > > ranges like >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > آ-ث | ج-خ | د-ژ | س-ظ | ع-ق | ک-ل | م-ی >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > when i do search for "د-ژ" range the results are wrong , >> they >> > > > > > > are the results of " س-ظ "range. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > for example when i do search for "د-ژ" one of the the >> results is >> > > > > > > "ساب ووفر", this result also shown on the " س-ظ " range's >> result >> > > > > > > list which is the corret range. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > As IndexSearcher use "compareTo" method and this method uses >> > > > > > > unicodes for comparing, i found the unicodes of the >> characters. >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > د=U+62F >> > > > > > > ژ = U+698 >> > > > > > > and the first letter of "ساب ووفر " is س = U+633 >> > > > > > >> > > > > > It appears to me that *both* the "د-ژ" range [ >> U+062F - U+0698 ] >> > > and >> > > > > > the "س-ظ" range [ U+0633 - U+0638 ] contain the >> first letter of >> > > "ساب >> > > > > > ووفر", which is "س" = U+0633. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > You stated that U+0633 should be contained in the [ >> U+0633 - U+0638 >> > > ] >> > > > > > range - I agree - but why do you think U+0633 should not be >> > > > > > contained in the [ U+062F - U+0698 ] range? >> > > > > > >> > > > > > In other words, it looks to me like your problem is >> not a problem >> > > at >> > > > > > all. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > Steve >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > -- View this message in context: >> > > > > >> > > http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-tp16977096p17019498 >> > > .html Sent >> > > > from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > > To >> > > > unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >> > > > additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- View this message in context: >> > http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-tp16977096p17022861.html >> > Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at >> Nabble.com. >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >> -- View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-tp16977096p17023557.html Sent >> from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To >> unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For >> additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/lucene-farsi-problem-tp16977096p17034715.html Sent from the Lucene - Java Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
