> This has NOTHING to do with the quality of Java or Java3d.
> If their products dont sell, their products DONT SELL.  They are NOT
selling java3d, rather technologies
> that leverage it. Your reasoning doesnt seem to make sense to me on
this.
>
> ian
>>
>> I noticed that the following products that uses Java3D had abandoned 
>> their development.

I can only support Ian's view on the issue. 

We are into application oriented research in knowledge management, and
my team is doing knowledge visualisations of all kind, and trying to
sell it to customers. The first thing that happened when the economy
started to go down was that even the few customers who'd shown interest
in 3D visualisation before immediatly retreated from the area. Yes,
perhaps a nice flash animation, some colored squares and circles,
"y'know, like, i've seen on that website, looked sooo nice", but no 3D
please, to hard to handle, no true advantage, inmature technology, you
name it.

In general, while 2D visualisation is flourishing and many companies
working in the field make good money, 3D is still a market of small
niches, for example medical data visualisation, and outside that niches
life is hard. 

Bottom line: I would not dare to judge the future potential of a
technology like Java3D by the success or failure of the product ideas of
a few startups.

Cheers

Wolfgang

==================================================================== 
Wolfgang Kienreich
Technical Research 
Knowledge Retrieval / Knowledge Visualization 
Know-Center  http://www.know-center.at
Inffeldgasse 16c, 8010 Graz, Austria 
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
phone : +43 316 820918 647 
fax   : +43 316 873 5688 
==================================================================== 



-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Discussion list for Java 3D API
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Ian M Nieves
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 26. Februar 2003 09:27
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [JAVA3D] Is Java3D going to be end-of-lifed?


This has NOTHING to do with the quality of Java or Java3d.
If their products dont sell, their products DONT SELL.  They are NOT
selling java3d, rather technologies that leverage it. Your reasoning
doesnt seem to make sense to me on this.

ian


On Tue, 25 Feb 2003, Scott wrote:

> I noticed that the following products that uses Java3D had abandoned 
> their development.
>
> WebScope3D from http://www.webscope3d.com/
> SolidWorks Viewer http://www.solidworks.com/
> SDRC(EDS) JView http://www.eds.com/products/plm/
> and
> JView3DPro from http://www.int.com/ is raising the
> concern regarding the future of the Java3D API!
>
> It's really sad to see it happened!
> If more companies raise the same concern and have a
> real doubt about the future of Java3D API, don't you think that 
> End-of-Lifed might not just be rumors anymore! It's becoming a fact in

> my mind!
>
> So what is the real issue behind all these doubts?
> Is this the general issue of Java on the Client side?
> Or it's the design of Java3d API itself?
> I would like to hear your opinion on this issue and
> if possible, share with us any success stories you have
> using the Java3D API.
>
>
> Regards
>
> Scott
>
> ======================================================================
> =====
> To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body
> of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST".  For general help, send
email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".
>
>

========================================================================
===
To unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the
body of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST".  For general help, send
email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message
"help".

==========================================================================To 
unsubscribe, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body
of the message "signoff JAVA3D-INTEREST".  For general help, send email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and include in the body of the message "help".

Reply via email to