Hi Roger

I think this is my point entirely. I am predisposed to live Groovy a
great deal, ever since I first used it I have liked it, and I
recommend it on a regular basis.

There is absolutely no embargo on Groovy stories (or spring stories
either come to that). Every time this year that a Groovy story crossed
my news comb, I included it in the podcast. My point was that there
just haven't been that many stories crossing my news feed. I believe
we hit all of the news stories that came out about Groovy this year,
but I would have liked to have seen more. We definitely covered the
groovy and grails releases (217, 213, 201, 184, 171)  and the news of
G2One's acquisition (Episode 217), but we didn't really have a lot to
say about that one - it's more business than technical, not our forte,
so it did not make it into the main stories. This is not to mention
the roundup sessions where Groovy was a major focus, along with
Guillaume's interview in February devoted to Groovy and Grails.

Try this search:

http://javaposse.com/?search_string=groovy&Submit=Search&search=1

I believe that demonstrates that when we have a Groovy story to cover,
it goes in.

But therein lies my point! There haven't been that many big stories
about Groovy this year. The G2One acquisition was pretty big I grant
you, but from a business perspective (and that's not what we do here
at the posse). Big stories for us are things like tooling being added
for major IDEs (something that happened a lot in Scala this year,
hence the excitement there), major language release milestones (wait
and see our coverage of Groovy 2 when it comes out). Amazing new sites
or hot new properties using Groovy, or important new libraries. Grails
1.0 was a biggy, and indeed was our lead story on the Feb 8th podcast!

I think some of the comments on this thread bear out the feeling too
though - Groovy needs some shouting. It needs some big news to keep it
in the minds and hearts of folks. The easy, low hanging fruit (like
IDE support) has already been done, so what's next to take it to the
next level? Scala is likely to face this same issue next year, the
momentum must be kept up.

I will report any story that comes in to my feed on Groovy, just as I
will on any of the JVM languages. If you look at some of the Groovy
stories I have included this year in fact (like GRAG), you will see
that I have actually included some pretty minor ones just to keep
Groovy in the conversation.

So, hopefully that says more precisely what I was unable to say except
in the most general terms in the podcast, all of us feel that Groovy
needs a bit more pizazz and fanfare right now.

Cheers

Dick

On Jan 8, 5:30 pm, RogerV <[email protected]> wrote:
> No one's complaining regarding the Posse's fandom for Scala.
>
> But lifting the embargo on anything Groovish or Springish would be
> nice  :-)
>
> BTW, so that I'm not perceived as painting myself as an outright
> Groovy fanboy, I don't believe a dynamic scripting language (even if
> it does compile to byte code) will be elgible for being the successor
> language to Java.
>
> I firmly believe that any successor language to Java (i.e., one that
> can fully take the place of where and how Java is used) will need to
> be a static typing language.
>
> From that perspective, Scala has more of a chance than Groovy.
>
> I instead see scripting languages as just being important addendum's
> to what can be used on the JVM, but not what will become a flagship
> language of the JVM.
>
> On Jan 8, 1:06 pm, kibitzer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > I genuinely don't understand putting the boot into the Posse for
> > talking about Scala. What's that about? If you listen consistently,
> > you understand that Carl is pretty sold on Scala, the others like it,
> > and that Dick has, for quite a while, dabbled in Groovy. So what?
> > They're just talking about what they've been playing with. The Posse
> > is, after all, the view of individuals, not an industry barometer.
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to