I think it is a deliberately controversial and cheap headline that stephen used to grab attention to an issue.
The JCP is a dinosaur of a process, lots of people aren't really happy with the rate of progress. It reeks of democracy - fine for governments, but design by the masses for a platform?? come on, not everyones vote really counts the same (nor should it)... (I have no idea how it compares to python PEP - would be interested for some comments though by those that know it). I think if the TCK is opened up sufficiently then it would be less controversial what is happening ? On Mar 27, 5:30 am, Josh Suereth <[email protected]> wrote: > Wow, > > This post enforces some of the concerns I had relating to Project Jigsaw > specifically. It does seem like sun was trying to "mildly" subvert it's own > JCP so that It could address market concerns quicker. While this makes > sense from a business perspective, it still seemed strange. I'd be > interested to hear what comments Tor has on this. > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM, James Iry <[email protected]> wrote: > > >http://www.jroller.com/scolebourne/entry/no_more_java_7 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
