"I think it is a deliberately controversial and cheap headline that stephen used to grab attention to an issue. "
I say that it is "cheap" because I have seen teh haterz paraphrase it as "Java 7 is dead ZOMG" headlines, which clearly not what was intended. On Mar 27, 1:01 pm, Michael Neale <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it is a deliberately controversial and cheap headline that > stephen used to grab attention to an issue. > > The JCP is a dinosaur of a process, lots of people aren't really happy > with the rate of progress. It reeks of democracy - fine for > governments, but design by the masses for a platform?? come on, not > everyones vote really counts the same (nor should it)... (I have no > idea how it compares to python PEP - would be interested for some > comments though by those that know it). > > I think if the TCK is opened up sufficiently then it would be less > controversial what is happening ? > > On Mar 27, 5:30 am, Josh Suereth <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Wow, > > > This post enforces some of the concerns I had relating to Project Jigsaw > > specifically. It does seem like sun was trying to "mildly" subvert it's own > > JCP so that It could address market concerns quicker. While this makes > > sense from a business perspective, it still seemed strange. I'd be > > interested to hear what comments Tor has on this. > > > On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:11 AM, James Iry <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >http://www.jroller.com/scolebourne/entry/no_more_java_7 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
