Well, we are tuning our demo for JavaOne and it's going to present exactly that. What we wanted for JavaFX Apps development process and what we achieved. I really like what we got now, a 20sec "mvn deploy" gives us the applet on-line, standard Hudson Maven plugin building the App, ability to include any jars from Maven repositories (3 lines in your POM :) and a small WebStart update time. I hope many will come to see the demo :)
See you at JavaOne, Fred. On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 3:37 AM, Joshua Marinacci <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is a great write up. Could you do me a huge favor?!! Could you > write up the changes you'd like to see in the JavaFX SDK (runtime, > tools, NB templates, etc.) that would make using JavaFX with Maven and > Hudson a lot easier? What would be your ideal building process for > JavaFX apps. This will help drive features for a future release. > > Thanks, > Josh > > On May 11, 2009, at 4:20 PM, Frederic Simon wrote: > > > > > Tor keep saying that NetBeans + JavaFX is great, and that Maven is > > well integrated in NetBeans, but using all 3 of them, on a real > > Application like TwitterFX, proved challenging. > > I think we managed to finalized a good developer environment with 2 > > new Maven plugins for JavaFX compile and JNLP generation. > > I saw on the group that we were not the first one to hit the issue. > > Anyway, I wrote a blog entry about it: > > > http://blogs.jfrog.org/2009/05/maven-and-javafx-story-of-twitterfx-pom.html > > > > Hope it helps, > > Fred. > > > > > > > > > > -- http://www.jfrog.org/ http://freddy33.blogspot.com/ http://nothingisinfinite.blogspot.com/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
