Jan Goyvaerts wrote: > The eternal Java-on-Mac problem... It's weird though. You would expect > more people have macs if there was a better support for Java. they just released _13 as a APD download so that is getting better. The fact that Apple is considering sending a bunch of people to my performance course says that Apple is still very much interested in Java.. so that is encouraging news. And Attila Szegedi has a 7.0 build floating about some where.. so I guess I'm saying I'm a bit lazy also ;-)
Kirk > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 2:54 PM, kirk <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > Jan Goyvaerts wrote: > > Apparently it's also available to linux and solaris. > but not on Mac.. Ironically I might have a few from Apple on my > performance tuning course the week after JavaONE. I'll be probing ;-) > > Kirk > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:16 PM, kirk > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote: > > > > > > Jan Goyvaerts wrote: > > > You mean beta also for the _14 release of yesterday ? > > > (http://java.sun.com/javase/downloads/?intcmp=1281) > > Yes, that is why I believe it needs to be unlocked before > you can > > use it > > but since I don't have a windows machine to give it a go, I'm > > relying on > > what Tony (the author of the G1) a while back. I'll be > talking to Tony > > next week at J1 to see what the current state of thinking is G1 > > development is. > > > > Kirk > > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:09 AM, kirk > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Jan Goyvaerts wrote: > > > > it's probably to have something to show at JavaOne :-) > > > G1 is not pay for play and _14 has been a target for > > experiential > > > release for almost a year. The official release is in 7.0. > > Until then > > > it's beta. > > > > > > Kirk > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Mark Derricutt > > > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> > > > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > When I first read that in the release notes my first > > > thoughts were > > > > that it followed the statement saying (paraphrased) > > "this code > > > > isn't production ready, but we've shipped it anyway, > > its not > > > > enabled by default, and your apps mightl behave > > differently to > > > > what you expect, if you're going to go an enable > this a > > > production > > > > environment now and you have issues, we won't > help if > > you don't > > > > have a support contract." > > > > > > > > I suspect when u14+ or JDK7 ships, this support > > requirement > > > would > > > > likely go away. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Discouragement is a dissatisfaction with the past, a > > > distaste for > > > > the present, and a distrust of the future > > > > - Maree De Jong, Life NZ. > > > > > > > > blog: http://www.talios.com > > > > podcast: http://www.illegalargument.com > > > > skype / twitter: talios > > > > Sent from Auckland, Auk, New Zealand > > > > > > > > On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Mario Camou > > > > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> > > > <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> <mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd like to know people's take on this SlashDot > > article: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
