On Sun, Jul 12, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Josh Suereth <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Michael Neale <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> Yes I hear that a lot. Jsf2 is *claimed* to be better: would like to >> hear from people that have used it (as opposed to vendors). >> >> I think it's too little, too late for jsf2. >> >> Also, even if jsf2 is made of awesome: there needs to be a better >> track record of keeping up with the web then was shown in the past (a >> fast moving jsr? Not likely). >> > > > I think I would use any framework made of awesome. I'd probably also go > for a web framework made of peanut butter. I really like peanut butter. > Plus it's malleable, like silly putty. > Now, a web framework made of silly putty, there's something I'd love to get my hands on. It's either that or something with the name "Groovy". > > - Josh > > > > > -- Viktor Klang Java Specialist Scala Loudmouth Lift Committer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
