Ah. One of our goals with JavaFX is to make it tool friendly but you should still be able to do everything cleanly at the code level. The APIs and language (JavaFX Script) were designed in parallel to make that happen.
- J On Jul 10, 2009, at 4:06 PM, Greg Reddin wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 5:56 PM, Joshua Marinacci<[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> I don't know the >> history of JSF (since I wasn't at Sun for part of it and never worked >> with it), but I suspect lack of focus was a part of it. > > I suspect some of it was due to a focus on tools vendors. If you're > using a tool to build an app it doesn't much matter if you have a > bunch of XML and the tool updates it for you. It's more a problem if > you're editing things by hand, which is what many of us like to do. > > Greg > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
