On Jul 28, 9:07 am, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]>
wrote:
> Chas Emerick wrote:
> > That said, maybe it's more appropriate to say that JavaFX *on the
> > desktop* is just another layer on AWT? And it probably won't come as
> > a shock that we're entirely uninterested in mobile platforms.
>
> I don't think it's appropriate either :-) JavaFX is another layer on
> Java2D, but all of its components, AFAIK, don't depend either on AWT or
> Swing.
It's funny, that's actually what I meant -- I've long since equated
AWT with Java2D, as I've not used an AWT widget directly in many
years. :-)
- Chas
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
