In my honest opinion, LINQ is the best thing about .NET. Can anything even compete with it? In particular, I'm thinking about LINQ2SQL.
I've seen for-comprehensions in other languages, but it's not the same as the SQL-like syntax in C#. On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Scala can't do LINQ either, since there's no support of expression > trees. A thing I'd also love to see in Fan - not necessarily access to > the AST, but an AST. > > /Casper > > On Nov 2, 9:39 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I'd probably be a scala convert if it had a dynamic option like Fan > > offers. I love Active Record. And scala can't do it. > > > > > > > > > Lately with the realization that while static is > > > preferable, dynamic is beneficial at times. It's less of an extremist > > > attitude, which is why you now find .NET linked with such > > > personalities as Martin Fowler and Gilad Bracha etc. > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
