w.r.t. linq, or something like it in Scala see my (13th) comment that starts: @Tommy in http://quoiquilensoit.blogspot.com/2009/11/scala-almost-as-good-as-c-net4.html
On Nov 2, 11:13 pm, Noctiluque <[email protected]> wrote: > w.r.t. linq, or something like it in Scala see my (13th) comment that > starts: @Tommy > > (I only have time for LINQ to Objects, LINQ to SQL is a nice to have > once you have the first, but I guess it depends on your day job) > > On Nov 2, 10:17 pm, Mohamed Bana <[email protected]> wrote: > > > In my honest opinion, LINQ is the best thing about .NET. Can anything even > > compete with it? In particular, I'm thinking about LINQ2SQL. > > > I've seen for-comprehensions in other languages, but it's not the same as > > the SQL-like syntax in C#. > > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Scala can't do LINQ either, since there's no support of expression > > > trees. A thing I'd also love to see in Fan - not necessarily access to > > > the AST, but an AST. > > > > /Casper > > > > On Nov 2, 9:39 pm, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > I'd probably be a scala convert if it had a dynamic option like Fan > > > > offers. I love Active Record. And scala can't do it. > > > > > > Lately with the realization that while static is > > > > > preferable, dynamic is beneficial at times. It's less of an extremist > > > > > attitude, which is why you now find .NET linked with such > > > > > personalities as Martin Fowler and Gilad Bracha etc. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
