I didn't even get a chance to reply but can I be in the scope of the idiot block too?
On Nov 3, 7:47 pm, Steven Herod <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you sure you needed to refer to the respondents as 'idiots'? > > Had a bad day? > > On Nov 3, 5:45 pm, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > You write an _obvious_ trolling post, with a link to your own blog no > > less, and yet you got 3 idiots to stop into your steaming pile? > > > Wow. I'm impressed. > > > NB: Idiots - recognize this hopeless behaviour for what it is, please. > > A look at the title would have sufficed. > > > On Nov 1, 5:24 pm, Noctiluque <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Poor etiquette, posting a link to my own blog, but in the last couple > > > of weeks I've realized just how far Java is behind C#. Maybe I should > > > have realized this long ago! The post is about my experience > > > translating a nice self contained C# .NET4 (in beta 2) program into > > > Scala 2.8 (pre release). The tragic thing is that the C# code is > > > pretty much equivelent to idiomatic Scala and (debatably) outclasses > > > Scala in a couple of areas. Java does not even come close to C# > > > anymore from a language features/expressivity point of view. Sniff. No > > > really. > > > >http://quoiquilensoit.blogspot.com/2009/11/scala-almost-as-good-as-c-... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
