Right, but for some reason that's a moot point! Hat off to father Steve for how they are succeeding in injecting their conviction - regardless of how many people are happily playing Farmville like games, enjoying interactive content and watching flash video.
/Casper On Apr 30, 8:37 pm, RogerV <[email protected]> wrote: > On Apr 30, 7:18 am, Reinier Zwitserloot <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Regardless of how apple rates the importance of #6 vs the other #5, > > I'm making the observation that the first 5 are more than enough to > > disprove the notion that adding a flash runtime will somehow make the > > iP* devices part of the "full web". And, as an addendum, that trying > > to force apple's hand in allowing a competitor on its turf seems like > > a bad fight to pick, given that flash really isn't doing the future of > > the web any favours. > > Flex SDK has revolutionized development of enterprise, corporate, and > vertical solution Internet apps over the last 3 years. It that realm > it kicks HTML and JavaScript into the last century. HTML5 still holds > no candle to it. Even as we're now moving the Flex 4 and Sparc, HTML5 > can't even come close to parity with what we were doing with just Flex > 2. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
