Many people thought JavaFX to be too little too late, the syntax is nice but frankly I think Sun should've gone all-in with this one or not do it at all.
The container model is outdated and proved to not really work very well. Clearly Steve Jobs stab at Flash actually includes Java (reading between the line and by inference). The difference is the Flash has momentum and is an actual threat, where as JavaFX is vapor-ware. When I call the container model outdated, it's with consideration to the Mono guys looking at plugging Ecma-335 directly into the core of the browser to supplement JavaScript [http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2010/ May-03.html]. /Casper On May 4, 4:04 am, Eddie <[email protected]> wrote: > With Flash being so popular yet it is debatable whether it is the > right technology to fit into the HTML world, is there really rooms for > JavaFX? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
