Agitator ;-)

Viktor Klang
Code Connoisseur
www.akkasource.com

On Sep 5, 2010, at 21:00, "Joe Nuxoll (Java Posse)" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I so love reading these debates! Go on gentlemen!
> 
> - Joe
> 
> On Sep 5, 8:36 am, Viktor Klang <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Guys, what are you hoping to accomplish with this discussion?
>> 
>> 2010/9/5 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 1:35 AM, Reinier Zwitserloot 
>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>> 
>>>> Europe has no software patents. Clearly the
>>>> lack of software patents does not stifle research budgets.
>> 
>>> Please reread my post. The question is whether the absence of software
>>> patents would allow for more or less innovations. In other words, is there
>>> more innovation in countries that don't have software patents than in
>>> countries that do.
>> 
>>> No matter how fast you want to answer this question, I'm saying it's really
>>> very hard to tell (and naïve observers would probably say that there is a
>>> lot more software innovation coming out of the US than in any other
>>> country).
>> 
>>>> I grant you apple is doing a far better job at it, but I don't see what
>>>> patent law
>>>> has to do with this.
>> 
>>> You are confusing innovating and protecting your innovations. We're talking
>>> about the latter.
>> 
>>>> You argue: If software patents didn't exist, companies may not  bother
>>>> with research. Well, nokia has the biggest budget and they live on an
>>>> entire continent without software patents.
>> 
>>> They are bound by US software patent laws for anything they want to sell on
>>> the US continent, so I'm pretty sure that US software patent laws have a
>>> huge impact on their product decisions.
>> 
>>> There still is innovation, but there is no proof that the innovation
>>>> that is happening is  being boosted by the US patent system.
>> 
>>> I agree, but this goes both ways. There is no obvious proof that the
>>> absence of software patent laws would boost innovation either.
>> 
>>>> For example, a large amount of startups don't patent anything, yet they
>>>> appear to be one of the main drivers of innovation.
>> 
>>> 99% of these start ups fail. Those that do well have either good
>>> technology, good people or a good patent portfolio (which is very often the
>>> main driver in an acquisition decision).
>> 
>>> Again, please don't twist my words, I'm simply drawing your attention to
>>> the fact that abolishing software patent laws overnight would have a lot of
>>> negative effects that you don't seem to want to consider.
>> 
>>>> I can point out a number of cases where patent law is actively stifling
>>>> innovation
>> 
>>> Me as well, and if you know what I was doing at my previous job, you
>>> probably know exactly what I'm referring to. And yet, I see this debate in a
>>> much more nuanced way than you are. Maybe this should cause you to pause.
>> 
>>> Also, patent law basically doesn't cover china. Which so happens to be
>>>> cheap
>>>> knockoff central, so your main point there just doesn't add up at all.
>> 
>>> Well, let me ask you a simple question, then: do you think we see more
>>> software innovations coming from China or coming from the US?
>> 
>>> --
>>> Cédric
>> 
>>>  --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>>> "The Java Posse" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> [email protected]<javaposse%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups 
>>> .com>
>>> .
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>> 
>> --
>> Viktor Klang,
>> Code Connoisseur
>> Work:  www.akkasource.com
>> Code:   github.com/viktorklang
>> Follow: twitter.com/viktorklang
>> Read:   klangism.tumblr.com
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
> 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to