I'm not 100% convinced, it seems that Scala only became involved in those threads where it was relevant.
While JVM closures, and the alleged "death" of Java, and alternatives to vendor lock-in with Oracle are all hot topics, I think it'll be difficult (impossible even) for Scala not to come up in discussions. It's also very informative to look at Scala representation in conferences such as Strange Loop, JAX, Javazone, Devoxx, etc. Not to mention Amazon book sales relating to JVM languages. The phenomenon is absolutely not limited to this mailing list! I vote to tag specifically Scala related topics with [Scala], and otherwise accept that it will come up as being relevant in other more general discussion. Specifically: "Request for Scala fans" - It's in the title, what else can I say... "JDK 7 delayed to mid 2012" - Lots of discussion concerning the lack of closures and possible alternatives. "simplicity trivial/complexity manageable" - Thread that I started, intending to concentrate Scala talk in one place. Didn't quite work out that way. "Mushroom Season - New language each year" - I'll accept blame on this one, after reading: "I don't think we are talking about noddy improvements in semantics or conciseness like Scala promotes. Scala adds nothing to Java in the real world, compared to a better persistence idiom". I felt obliged to correct the numerous misunderstandings and misrepresentations there, sorry about that! "Management: For now Java is no longer an option for new development" - Which led to the obvious debate on "what is an option then". Scala was suggested. On 11 September 2010 12:45, Mario Fusco <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Reiner is right. There are lots of Scala fans here including > myself. And it seems we have the bad habit (not trait :) ) to diverge > many discussion on Scala related topics. > > Anyway this is also the symptom of an always growing hype around > Scala. For these reasons I suppose it could be a great idea to branch > this group and create a brand new one more specifically related to > Scala. > > At this purpose I just registered The Scala Posse group: > http://groups.google.com/group/scalaposse hoping to move there all the > threads speaking about Scala. Do you think It makes sense? > > For all the Scala developers, let me know if this initiative could be > interesting to you. > > Cheers, > Mario > > P.S.: I don't know if I am violating some intellectual property or > even if I am doing something wrong in any other sense by using the > "Posse" name. In this case, please let me know it and I will change > the name of the group immediately. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
