"rest of the world into thinking the UK still has
the same influence as it did during the 1800"

a bit like the USA today.



On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 7:32 PM, Miroslav Pokorny
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Russel Winder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 19:54 +1100, Miroslav Pokorny wrote:
>> > I wonder how much this is an example of the British policy of
>> > mangnificant isolation and so where they would make alliances that
>> > resulted in the status quo remaining the same, avoiding any one power
>> > becoming too strong. Its not so much the value gained from the
>> > alliance but rather that it keeps weaken some competitors at the
>> > expense of improving the situation of others.
>>
>> USA, Japan, China have had isolationist periods, but I am not sure UK
>> has ever done that sort of thing.  Quite the opposite, the UK government
>> still tries to con the rest of the world into thinking the UK still has
>> the same influence as it did during the 1800s.
>>
>
> The USA has not had an isolationist policy since WW2 - in case you have
> forgotten, they have started more wars and enacted more military actions etc
> in the last 50 years than everyone else put together.
>
>
>>
>> Interestingly there are many parallels between the recent behaviours of
>> the major US computing-related corporations and the behaviours of the
>> European governments in the 1860--1914 period.
>>
>> --
>> Russel.
>>
>> =============================================================================
>> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
>> sip:[email protected]
>> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: [email protected]
>> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splendid_isolation
>
> Splendid Isolation was the foreign policy pursued by Britain during the late
> 19th century, under the Conservative premierships of Benjamin Disraeli and
> the Marquess of Salisbury. The term was actually coined by a Canadian
> politician to praise Britain's lack of involvement in European affairs.
> There is much debate between historians over whether this policy was
> intentional or whether Britain simply was forced into the position by
> contemporary events.
>
> .. now replace Britain with say IBM and European affairs with 'java" is my
> original statement fair ?
>
> --
> mP
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to