Yet it was Apple themselves who deprecated the Java-Cocoa bindings. That was a sad day... Whatever way we try to interpret this, it's far from being clear cut.
I'd love to know what discussions have taken place between Oracle and Apple, behind closed doors (and you can be quite certain that they *have* happened) On 21 October 2010 12:53, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Which we all know just ain't true, as has been demonstrated time and time > > again in numerous case studies. > > True, hobbyists who care can go further than professionals that don't. > However, the divergence of virtual machine and programming language in > the Java world does not exactly help here, the JVM is bound to get > competition from other VM's like LLVM, Parrot and the CLR! Case of > point, it seems like Apple has no issue with applications being > written in C# via Mono (MonoMac and MonoTouch), as long as this is > transparent to end end-user experience (bundled CLR using custom UI > toolkit with native bindings). > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Kevin Wright mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected] pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright twitter: @thecoda -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
