"hey, it[Scala] can already target .NET!"

.NET 1.0 only still, right?

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, Scala itself can be fairly-easily retrofitted to compile against a
> different back-end (hey, it can already target .NET!) and there's a project
> already on GitHub allowing LLVM to be targeted.  I wouldn't be at all
> surprised to see other languages taking a similar approach.
> There's also a good chance of more effort going into projects like VMKit - a
> JVM implemented over LLVM.  It'll be interesting to see what happens with
> regards to user interfaces in this regard (I guess swing will be out), I can
> imagine any number of fascinating possibilities based on LLVM code running
> directly on a GPU.
>
>
> On 21 October 2010 14:20, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2:14 pm, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Yet it was Apple themselves who deprecated the Java-Cocoa bindings.
>> >  That
>> > was a sad day...
>>
>> Yeah they certainly seem to have a "remove the band-aid slowly and
>> perhaps nobody will notice" strategy.
>>
>> Our own posse chief, Dick Wall, has gone all-in with Scala. It's thus
>> not that hard to imagine a future where the runtime is irrelevant and
>> we will just use whichever fits the best, and bundle it along with
>> required libraries. Unfortunately for JSE, it failed to renew itself
>> and remain attractive... Apple's issue is not really with Java [the
>> language], but with the platform (runtime and particular the UI
>> libraries).
>>
>> My prediction for the future is that desktop Java will continue to
>> fade away much like applets have done [shameless plug, I investigated
>> that issue a few years ago: http://goo.gl/wZ6V]. Apple not only
>> recognizes this, they choose to take an active part (as they have with
>> Flash). So either Oracle pours a ginourmous amount of cash into it, or
>> the community shows remarkable synergy and determination. Or... we
>> just move on.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "The Java Posse" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> [email protected].
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Kevin Wright
>
> mail / gtalk / msn : [email protected]
> pulse / skype: kev.lee.wright
> twitter: @thecoda
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "The Java Posse" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected].
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to