On 10/28/2010 03:50 PM, Fabrizio Giudici wrote:
So, they are not talking (only) of implementing the specs, but of code being _directly_ copied. I'd be deeply surprised by that, because it would have been a blatant error by Apache, which I think is very competent and careful about this sort of issues. OTOH, it's hard for me to imagine that Oracle uses a blatantly useless weapon, furthermore as part of an escalation (I mean, it's not that patent claims have been dismissed yet and they have to desperately resort to another thing).
Here it's a sample of the alleged evidences by Oracle: http://www.zdnet.com/blog/btl/oracle-says-google-directly-copied-java-code-heres-the-line-by-line-comparison/41025 http://www.scribd.com/doc/40316099/orclgoogcode -- f.g. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
