>The bad movie is seeing people declaring Oracle wrong as soon as there's >a controversy, probably without thinking too much
well clearly that isn't happening here - there was a lot of discussion - and it was sparked by an un-announced migration/work - so people thought it was time to move it somewhere else. There has been lots of discussion elsewhere, but there isn't anything premature about it (you might want to read up on it, it is quite interesting). Who knows what will happen, but hudson, in whatever form (maybe even called something else) will be all the stronger for it anyway. On Dec 2, 5:53 am, Fabrizio Giudici <[email protected]> wrote: > The bad movie is seeing people declaring Oracle wrong as soon as there's > a controversy, probably without thinking too much. > > Oracle is spending lots of money and effort to migrate java.net to > kenai. I suppose they expect the new forge to keep the most visible > projects in the community, right? Why Oracle shouldn't find it hostile > to learn that people want to move the project to another forge and not > to stay at home at Kenai? If Oracle is correct in the fact that they > hold the copyright on the Hudson name, shouldn't Hudson be considered, > for the sake of branding, like Glassfish? What would you say if somebody > proposed to move Glassfish to another forge? > > -- > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici -www.tidalwave.it/people > [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
