Is there a bit of irony that Java Desktop apps tend to be IDE's that
are often used to write in languages other than Java itself?

On Dec 14, 6:38 am, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote:
> > With the latest evolutions, JavaFX is just Swing 2.0 for Java. So, it
> > will fit in a scenario of "normal" Java desktop applications, I'm no
> > more seeing it as a Flash / Javascript alternative. So, it's not dead,
> > but the original target for it is.
>
> But "normal" Java desktop applications aren't exactly flourishing,
> beyond developer circles and IDE's in particular. So I actually think
> it will also be dead in a year or two... currently in a bit of a
> zombie state, not really dead but not really alive either.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The 
Java Posse" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.

Reply via email to