well, Apple is probably done for quite awhile with the iPhone. I mean there isn't much point in upping the resolution beyond 960x640 for a 3.5" (or even 4") display. They might bump the iPad though. Would be pretty sweet to get a 2048 x 1539 9.7" display. But I'm guessing that's not economically viable. So yes, they may have to deal with a non-integer multiple if they want to up the resolution.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:22 AM, Casper Bang <[email protected]> wrote: >> In the long run, having fragmentation built-in as a fundamental assumption >> from the beginning might turn out to be an advantage. > > I agree, it's a bit more trouble up-front but a nice reward down the > road. And let's face it, Apple can't continue to just double the > screen resolution (quadruple the surface area) on new devices! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
