On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:52 AM, Blanford <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would have expected more people to agree with me, honestly.
Most people do think more people should agree with every assertion made. > Most Java EE features have been obsoleted (including EJB), in favor of > solutions like webservices. Um... Java EE features include webservices. So a Java EE feature obsoletes a Java EE feature. I, um, rather unexpectedly disagree. > Concerning running applications in clusters, load balancing solutions > like F5 and NetApp have performed swimmingly. And this invalidates Java EE somehow, I'm sure... but darned if I can tell how. > Most of the major tools you use and develop with are Java SE or an > equivalent like Harmony or Dalvik. ... using APIs from Java EE for Java EE functionality. > Regardless, I understand I am in the minority, you still owe it to > yourself to listen to this episode of software engineering radio: >From 2006? Hey, did you know that it's almost 2011 now? -- Joseph B. Ottinger http://enigmastation.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
