On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Vince O'Sullivan <[email protected]>wrote:
> "we are unable to justify the continued allocation of resources" > > It's a perfectly reasonable reason for the the move. However, given > that NetBeans is given away for free (as in free beer) the question > has to be asked: What, exactly, does justify the allocation of > resources? How, for instance, is the allocation of NetBeans resources > to Java justified? What are the criteria that failed to be met by > Ruby? > Obviously, mind share and the fact that Ruby on Rails generates zero revenue for Oracle. -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
