What a coincidence... Jetbrains proposed RubyMine today also. ! :-) http://www.jetbrains.com/ruby/
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 21:46, Vince O'Sullivan <[email protected]>wrote: > "we are unable to justify the continued allocation of resources" > > It's a perfectly reasonable reason for the the move. However, given > that NetBeans is given away for free (as in free beer) the question > has to be asked: What, exactly, does justify the allocation of > resources? How, for instance, is the allocation of NetBeans resources > to Java justified? What are the criteria that failed to be met by > Ruby? > > Vince. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<javaposse%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
