Today I've run into Qi4j: http://www.qi4j.org/qi4j/146.html
Many good things in the basic principles, which I'm using since a few time, but I'm not convinced on the rest. Also, while I understand the introduction of the term "Component Oriented Programming" to stress out some strong differences in a world of getter/setters and fat classes, to me it just sounds as Object Oriented Programming, just well done. Thoughts?
-- Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people [email protected] -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
