If I'm not mistaken, this idea came up after a blog post I wrote a while ago<http://beust.com/weblog/2005/08/09/quantum-software-design/>. Rickard and I ended up discussing this idea of "quantum software design" in more depth in the months that followed and I remember him telling me that this helped him come up with the ideas behind Qi4j.
As you will see if you take the time to read the Qi4j tutorials, Rickard pushed this idea much further since then. -- Cédric On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Fabrizio Giudici < [email protected]> wrote: > Today I've run into Qi4j: > > http://www.qi4j.org/qi4j/146.html > > > Many good things in the basic principles, which I'm using since a few time, > but I'm not convinced on the rest. Also, while I understand the introduction > of the term "Component Oriented Programming" to stress out some strong > differences in a world of getter/setters and fat classes, to me it just > sounds as Object Oriented Programming, just well done. Thoughts? > > -- > Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect, Project Manager > Tidalwave s.a.s. - "We make Java work. Everywhere." > java.net/blog/fabriziogiudici - www.tidalwave.it/people > [email protected] > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. > > -- Cédric -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
