On 31 Mar 2011 08:10, "Ricky Clarkson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > A joke explained is a joke destroyed. :) >
:) > > On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Matthew Farwell <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> By definition, it can't. If it does, then it's not functional :-) >> >> Matthew. >> >> 2011/3/31 Ricky Clarkson <[email protected]>: >> > I think we all know that functional programming won't change the world. >> > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
