2011/4/14 Cédric Beust ♔ <[email protected]>: > I think the only languages that have successfully tackled the "statically > typed XML in Java" problem so far are Fantom (take a look at how they define > GUI's in pure Fantom) and JavaFX. Scala's support for XML literals bridges > some gap there but not in the same seamless manner.
What, exactly, is the "statically typed XML in Java" problem? I admit I like Scala's xml support, but only when inputting or outputting xml. If I'm just writing code, seems I'd rather not have to care about how it is being represented. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
