Out of actual, honest to goodness curiosity - why are "restful URLs" a good, desired thing?
That all depends on the type of webframework, or the type of application your writing. For "web sites" I can see restful URLs that are -stateless- would be useful. "restful URLs" that also use fragments are client side only so don't really relate to server frameworks..... -- "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, Porcupine Tree On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:39 AM, phil swenson <[email protected]>wrote: > 1) restful URLs > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
