1) restful urls often indicate what they are showing (http://blah/users/philswenson/profile) 2) more importantly, they are sharable and bookmark-able. It's important when you want to send a link to someone to share the exact state/location of the application/data
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Mark Derricutt <[email protected]> wrote: > Out of actual, honest to goodness curiosity - why are "restful URLs" a good, > desired thing? > > That all depends on the type of webframework, or the type of application > your writing. For "web sites" I can see restful URLs that are -stateless- > would be useful. "restful URLs" that also use fragments are client side only > so don't really relate to server frameworks..... > > > -- > "Great artists are extremely selfish and arrogant things" — Steven Wilson, > Porcupine Tree > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 5:39 AM, phil swenson <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> 1) restful URLs > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "The Java Posse" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "The Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
