On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Kevin Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > That's an old article. Scala's now on 2.9.2 and soon to be 2.10, binary > compatibility is being taken very seriously.
My point was that any company that was practicing the fearless programming you were describing would make those concerns a breath of fresh air. > Trust me, the industry *do* care. All except for those parts of it who see > IT as an unfortunate cost centre, and wish it could just have been locked > permanently at COBOL so they'd avoid all those awkward programmer salaries. > I'm hoping that the vast majority of people on this list appreciate the > futility of such an attitude. Find me any evidence of this outside of the OSGi camp. Because I just don't see it. I keep getting the feeling that I'm told I should care about it, but no compelling reasons why. So... Citations needed. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
