I'm sure I could work out something about mining the "lodes" and refining then from virgin XML ore into pure annotations. Just need a shorter/wittier way to say it :)
On 19 February 2013 09:44, Joseph Ottinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Your wrong, spring still needs lodes of xml and its slow > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 4:40 AM, rakesh mailgroups < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> sorry, pressed send before I meant to..... >> >> >> And Spring 3 introduced Java configuration. >> >> Thats right, you can have a Spring project with next to zero XML. >> >> Get your facts right people!!!! >> >> Rakesh >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:38 AM, rakesh mailgroups < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> remember a few years ago when Java was under the mistaken believe it was >>> slow? Of course this wasn't a believe held within the community because we >>> knew Sun had done a lot of work to improve the JVM. >>> >>> Frustrating wasn't it? >>> >>> Well I see a similar situation with Spring. >>> >>> Spring means XML hell right? >>> >>> WRONG! >>> >>> For at least 3 years there's been annotations for wiring >>> >> >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
