On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:09:15 +0100, rakesh mailgroups
<[email protected]> wrote:
sounds like what you're saying is that if I don't know something
directly,
just go with hearsay, even if it is untrue.
Hearsay might be better as "advice from some people I trust" (let's say
it's also more professional). But even some people I trust might not have
the time to learn all the things in the appropriate way. So, their opinion
could be not true. Creating a rationale awareness on everything you need
is a hard job.
The pressure to know more and more is probably responsible in this
competitive market.
Sure. Since I don't see any solution to this pressure (until the world
breaks down - it will - and finds another equilibrium at a lower speed),
the correct solution should be for corporates to spend more for tech
classes and hire mentors devoted to fill the gaps. Of course, you should
be still aware of the limits of each teacher/mentor, and - as for my
previous statements on products - there will be still some subjective
perspective (this is unavoidable). But if you pick teachers/mentors in
function of their ability of presenting sound reasoning, citations, etc...
in order to create a rationale that's as objective as possible, this
should be the right way.
--
Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s.
"We make Java work. Everywhere."
http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog - [email protected]
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java
Posse" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
