actually let me qualify that. You can write your business classes without any wiring information but when you write your Java class that does the wiring, you need to use annotations there. I really like that approach as the classes are all about wiring anyway and so the annotations belong there.
Rakesh On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:41 AM, rakesh mailgroups < [email protected]> wrote: > YES! > > > On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Ricky Clarkson <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Annotations are basically inline XML. I can't programatically set them, >> so they just make the XML prettier/inline, not go away. Can I actually use >> Spring without annotations and without XML? >> >> >> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Fabrizio Giudici < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:09:15 +0100, rakesh mailgroups < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> sounds like what you're saying is that if I don't know something >>>> directly, >>>> just go with hearsay, even if it is untrue. >>>> >>> >>> Hearsay might be better as "advice from some people I trust" (let's say >>> it's also more professional). But even some people I trust might not have >>> the time to learn all the things in the appropriate way. So, their opinion >>> could be not true. Creating a rationale awareness on everything you need is >>> a hard job. >>> >>> >>> The pressure to know more and more is probably responsible in this >>>> competitive market. >>>> >>> >>> Sure. Since I don't see any solution to this pressure (until the world >>> breaks down - it will - and finds another equilibrium at a lower speed), >>> the correct solution should be for corporates to spend more for tech >>> classes and hire mentors devoted to fill the gaps. Of course, you should be >>> still aware of the limits of each teacher/mentor, and - as for my previous >>> statements on products - there will be still some subjective perspective >>> (this is unavoidable). But if you pick teachers/mentors in function of >>> their ability of presenting sound reasoning, citations, etc... in order to >>> create a rationale that's as objective as possible, this should be the >>> right way. >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Fabrizio Giudici - Java Architect @ Tidalwave s.a.s. >>> "We make Java work. Everywhere." >>> http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/**blog <http://tidalwave.it/fabrizio/blog>- >>> [email protected] >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Java Posse" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to >>> javaposse+unsubscribe@**googlegroups.com<javaposse%[email protected]> >>> . >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >>> Visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/**group/javaposse?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en> >>> . >>> For more options, visit >>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out> >>> . >>> >>> >>> >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Java Posse" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/javaposse?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
