I would relegate the chronic forwarders to purgatory and save the large spot
in hell for the virus/worm creators. It is much easier to deal with the
unwanted forwards with the press of a key, not so always for the malware
creators. Straying from the topic of JAWS though.
Joni
-----Original Message-----
From: Trish
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 4:22 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] Finding list of fixes in Jaws 13.718
Here here here Mr. Dan, you sure get my vote too on those folk's place in
hell and their forwards!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Rossi" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, February 12, 2012 2:41 PM
Subject: Re: [JAWS-Users] Finding list of fixes in Jaws 13.718
I typically top post, or will leave a portion of the message I am referring
to at the top, with my comments below, on blindness related lists.
However, I would not say that it is proper netiquette to always top post.
The vast majority of lists that I am on that are not blindness related do
not top post. Also, many of the web based question and answer forums do
not top post.
I do feel that it is proper netiquette to spend the 30 seconds it takes to
remove header information, and extraneous text when leaving your comments
below the original post.
And, I believe there is a special place in hell for people who forward
without removing all the previous header information.
--
Blue skies.
Dan Rossi
Carnegie Mellon University.
E-Mail: [email protected]
Tel: (412) 268-9081
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
For answers to frequently asked questions about this list visit:
http://www.jaws-users.com/help/
