Now we are getting somewhere. > On Mon, 2001-12-03 at 22:43, Dain Sundstrom wrote: > > You are performing due diligence. You see things you have > not seen before > > and they give you a queasy feeling. (right?) So what don't > you like? Try to > > start a discussion, and ask questions instead of writing > vague accusations. > > Fair enough. > > - What formal guarantees are there that my contributions will not be > used to create a for-profit proprietary product?
It already has. I believe that webgain already imbeds JBoss. It is an LPGL license after all. Or is that not what you ment? > - What guarantee do I have that JBoss will remain a fair and > participatory organization that does not isolate members for purely > political or profit-motivated reasons as opposed to matters purely > technical? > > - What actions are underway to migrate JBoss' ownership from > Marc to an > organization with formal, published by-laws that is managed in an open > and participatory manner? > > - Is there anything akin to the Debian Social Contract in JBoss? A > "social contract" between JBoss and its community? > (http://www.debian.org/social_contract) > > Answers to questions like these will determine the extent > that we invest > in a shared infrastructure or directly hire people to mature the > infrastructure ourselves. > The rest of these are good question. I personally don't care about their answers. It is just my own time and money invested. I am and always have been prepared to walk. For you it is not your money and you have a fiduciary responsibly to your stock holders. I personally like the benevolent dictator, and dislike other overly politicized styles. To each their own. -dain _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
