Hello Alex,

I've got it.
[FoeDeployer] Starting - the beginning of the method
FoeDeployer.startService()
[FoeDeployer] Started - the end of it.

But it looks messy in case of deploying (actually any) deployer when
there are waiting deployable units.

alex


Friday, May 24, 2002, 4:53:33 PM, you wrote:

AL> Hello David,

AL> I asked that because I found it strange that the deployer not being
AL> started already deploys some units, if the log is right. So, the log
AL> is like:
AL> [FoeDeployer] Starting
AL> [MainDeployer] Adding deployer: ....
AL> [MainDeployer] Starting deployment of package: <waitinig unit>
AL> [FoeDeployer] create()....
AL> ...
AL> [FoeDeployer] Started

AL> when I expected it like this:
AL> [FoeDeployer] Starting
AL> [FoeDeployer] Started
AL> [MainDeployer] Adding deployer: ....
AL> [MainDeployer] Starting deployment of package: <waitinig unit>
AL> [FoeDeployer] create()....
AL> ...

AL> Am I wrong?

AL> Friday, May 24, 2002, 4:20:33 PM, you wrote:

DJ>> From your description below I think FoeDeployer depends on
DJ>> WebLogicConverter.  If you explicitly state this dependency with a depends
DJ>> tag the deployment system will create WLC before FD and start WLC before
DJ>> FD.  If FD is designed to accept lots of converters you can use a
DJ>> depends-list element.

DJ>> How does FD know about WLC now?  I'd recommend using an ObjectName and
DJ>> calling through the mbean server.

DJ>> If you want to allow dynamically adding converters you will have to make FD
DJ>> keep a list of undeployables that it tries to deploy whenever a new
DJ>> converter is registered.  I don't think I recommend this.

DJ>> david jencks

-- 
Best regards,
 Alex Loubyansky



_______________________________________________________________

Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm

_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to