I want best of both worlds that's one of my main concerns,

a user that like doing java will do and a user that want
thing as simple as editing a JSP will do.

I don't say JMX is the way to go, but if I don't choose
that, I will have to mimic parts of it. so ?

They have kind of registries for modules, themes and blocks
in postnuke : with directories.

They have a component model, just function call.

JMX provide it and it's possible to have still PHP style
directories with JSP or similar things inside.

julien

BS> Are we developing this for the PHP community or the Java community?  Or
BS> more important for the JBoss community?  To me it seems that it would
BS> depend on who you are targeting for your user base.  If you want to
BS> target the PHP users to bring them to JBoss, then Bill could be right.
BS> If we do not care about the PHP community, we go down the JMX way.  I
BS> think the PHP community will never want to do anything with JSP.  They
BS> believe they have what they need to be successful and will continue to
BS> innovate in their own circle.  For most of the PHP community, what they
BS> have built is scalable to their needs. 

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill Burke
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 1:51 PM
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>> 
>> The only negative comment I have in using JMX is that the PHP
BS> community
>> may
>> have a tough time switching over to Nukes on JBoss if you have to have
BS> a
>> package structure like a SAR or a WAR.  I hate to say it, but does it
BS> need
>> to be "dumbed-down" for the PHP community?  This type of community
BS> needs
>> to
>> be able to edit a JSP and immediately see the change on the webserver.
BS> Is
>> it possible to be all JSP based for themes, modules and blocks?  You
BS> could
>> use a URL fragement and JSP:Include to decide what theme to use.
>> 
>> Just a thought.  Maybe JMX and such is the way to go.  Just want to
BS> give
>> you
>> something to think about.
>> 
>> Bill
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
>> > julien viet
>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:31 AM
>> > To: SourceForge.net
>> > Subject: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev
>> >
>> >
>> > hi folks,
>> >
>> >  JNuke adventure has started.
>> > After analysis of PostNuke I've began the development, still early
>> though.
>> >
>> >  I keep everything that's good in PostNuke and throw all the shit
BS> away :
>> >
>> >  modules, blocks, permissions system, url system and themes.
>> >
>> >  JMX is used for PostNuke components : themes,
>> > modules and blocks are all JMX mbeans. Here are my reasons :
>> >
>> >  A : general
>> >
>> >  1.we need a component structure, why not JMX ? after all
>> >    another forum say that's lightweight.
>> >
>> >  2.theses components do not have to scale, i.e the number of
BS> modules,
>> >    blocks and themes is very small.
>> >
>> >  B : for modules
>> >
>> >  1.Ability to deploy/undeploy when application is running.
>> >
>> >  2.It's easy to deploy additional modules as a separate deployment
BS> and
>> >    have them register in the same registry.
>> >
>> >  3.PostNuke is all about invoking module functions.
>> >    Url like index.php?module=User&op=register means
>> >    that the PN must call the method register on module User.
>> >    For me that means that the servlet retrieves the mbean
>> >    under the name jnuke:publicmodules:name=User
>> >    and invokes the operation register().
>> >
>> >  4.When a module is installed and configured it plug
>> >    block mbeans in the JMX.
>> >
>> >  C : for blocks, same reasons as above except 3 and 4
>> >      as invocation is typed for 3.
>> >
>> >  D : for themes, same reasons as above except 3 and 4
>> >      as invocation is typed for 3.
>> >
>> >
>> >  EJB are used for the model :
>> >
>> >  UserEJB, GroupEJB, UserPermissionEJB, UserGroupEJB will
>> > be CMP 2.0 beans. We'll use local invocations and same trick
>> > as in forum to make them faster. Plus more beans.
>> >
>> >  Each module is made of :
>> >
>> >  1.ModuleMBean : is the module itself, does not provide
BS> fucntionnalities,
>> >   it's used to manager the PublicModule. Main operations are
BS> lifecycle
>> >   (initialize, activate, unactivate, uninitialize)
>> >
>> >  2.PublicModuleMBean : is created when ModuleMBean activates and is
>> >    responsible for serving requests. The MBean is dynamic and
BS> operations
>> >    with no arguments and no returns are served.
>> >
>> >   It's up to the module to do as he wants : if he wants MVC it can,
BS> it
>> >   it wants to mix HTML and code, it can. First modules won't be MVC
>> >   as they simply don't need.
>> >
>> >   It's up to the model to have the persistence mecanisms it wants.
BS> First
>> >   modules will use EJB. With lifecycle operations, each module can
>> install
>> >   itself, for instance :
>> >
>> >   a ModuleMBean is plugged :
>> >   1.module configuration, setup of variables
>> >   2.initialize : module can creates table, deploy EJB, plugs block.
>> >   3.activate : module
>> >   then go to block admin and creates instances of blocks (if module
>> >   use blocks), display them on the page.
>> >
>> >  Each block is made of :
>> >
>> >  1.BlockMBean : manages BlockInstanceMBean.
>> >  2.BlockInstanceMBean : is a block instance, it contains a title
>> > and a position
>> >    on web page + 3 operations : display(), edit(), update().
>> >    display() : displays the block instance
>> >    edit() : used to edit the block in block administration
>> >    update() : used to upate the block in block admin
>> >
>> >  Each them is made of various callbacks that displays HTML on the
BS> page.
>> >  It has to provide location of files like css, gifs, etc...
>> >  THe first them I did is made of a servlet that register to JMX
>> >  and the doGet operation serves the files. It's default theme.
>> >  To make the thing simpler, it will be possible to make theme with
BS> JSP
>> >  because I want to keep post nuke spirit.
>> >
>> >  Ideally, even Module and Blocks could be made as JSP of things
>> > like that, that keeps
>> >  PHP easy to do spirit.
>> >
>> >  I did not thought a lot about permissions. In PostNuke, each
>> > module is responsible
>> >  for checking security. I know that could be done with AOP but I
>> > don't know if it's
>> >  gonna now, later or never :-)
>> >
>> >  One problem is the configuration persistence. I don't know how
>> > our JMX implementation
>> > is far there. But if there is a restart, all config must be
>> > re-done. JMX persistence
>> > will save us there. Even though it's plain file and not JDBC.
>> >
>> >  I will check out later (now it's a true mess), but I can say what
>> works :
>> >  Themes + default theme is done
>> >  block
>> >  modules and module invocation.
>> >  That means that yes, it displays me something that's nice to watch
>> >  and I can invoke some operations although it's very early.
>> >
>> >  So now, I am going back to code because time matters.
>> >
>> > julien
>> >
>> > ___________________________________________________________
>> > Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en frangais !
>> > Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com
>> >
>> >
>> > -------------------------------------------------------
>> > This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE  SSL Guide from Thawte
>> > are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
>> > Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your  SSL security
BS> issues.
>> > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Jboss-development mailing list
>> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving
>> your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL
>> certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to
BS> get
>> started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jboss-development mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



BS> -------------------------------------------------------
BS> This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving 
BS> your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL 
BS> certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get 
BS> started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en
BS> _______________________________________________
BS> Jboss-development mailing list
BS> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BS> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development



-- 
Best regards,
 julien                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving 
your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL 
certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get 
started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en
_______________________________________________
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development

Reply via email to