Hello, And what would be the goal for that? Could you give examples? regards, WS
--- marc fleury <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > dain :) > > marcf > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > On > > Behalf Of Bill Burke > > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:32 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: JBossScript was RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev > > > > > > Anybody want to take this on? Could be an > interesting > > project. I think the idea has merit Dain. Great > thought. > > > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > Bill Burke > > Chief Architect > > JBoss Group, LLC > > XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of > > > Bill Burke > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 3:26 PM > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev > > > > > > > > > Its a good idea. Anybody want to implement > this? > > JBossScript we can > > > call it. > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > Behalf Of > > > > Dain Sundstrom > > > > Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 2:16 PM > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill, > > > > > > > > This reminds me of an I deal I has last night > (couldn't > > sleep). I > > > > was thinking of the script based MBean support > Sacha added, and I > > > > thought can we make plain old java work like a > scripting > > language. > > > > Here is what I came up with: > > > > + The user writes a class BlahService.java > > > > + This source file is places in our > deployment directory > > > > + We run Xdoclet on it to generate the > MBean > > deployment descriptor > > > > + We compile the java file > > > > + Deploy > > > > > > > > Java as a scripting language. > > > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > > > -dain > > > > > > > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 12:50 PM, > Bill Burke wrote: > > > > > > > > > The only negative comment I have in using > JMX is that the PHP > > > > > community may have a tough time switching > over to Nukes > > on JBoss > > > > > if you have to have a > > > > > package structure like a SAR or a WAR. I > hate to say > > it, but does it > > > > > need > > > > > to be "dumbed-down" for the PHP community? > This type > > of community > > > > > needs to > > > > > be able to edit a JSP and immediately see > the change on > > the webserver. > > > > > Is > > > > > it possible to be all JSP based for themes, > modules and > > blocks? You > > > > > could > > > > > use a URL fragement and JSP:Include to > decide what theme to use. > > > > > > > > > > Just a thought. Maybe JMX and such is the > way to go. > > Just want > > > > > to give you something to think about. > > > > > > > > > > Bill > > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > > > >> From: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >> > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf > > > > >> Of julien viet > > > > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 11:31 AM > > > > >> To: SourceForge.net > > > > >> Subject: [JBoss-dev] JNuke dev > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> hi folks, > > > > >> > > > > >> JNuke adventure has started. > > > > >> After analysis of PostNuke I've began the > development, still > > > > >> early though. > > > > >> > > > > >> I keep everything that's good in PostNuke > and throw > > all the shit > > > > >> away : > > > > >> > > > > >> modules, blocks, permissions system, url > system and themes. > > > > >> > > > > >> JMX is used for PostNuke components : > themes, > > > > >> modules and blocks are all JMX mbeans. Here > are my reasons : > > > > >> > > > > >> A : general > > > > >> > > > > >> 1.we need a component structure, why not > JMX ? after all > > > > >> another forum say that's lightweight. > > > > >> > > > > >> 2.theses components do not have to scale, > i.e the > > number of modules, > > > > >> blocks and themes is very small. > > > > >> > > > > >> B : for modules > > > > >> > > > > >> 1.Ability to deploy/undeploy when > application is running. > > > > >> > > > > >> 2.It's easy to deploy additional modules > as a separate > > > deployment and > > > > >> have them register in the same registry. > > > > >> > > > > >> 3.PostNuke is all about invoking module > functions. > > > > >> Url like > index.php?module=User&op=register means > > > > >> that the PN must call the method > register on module User. > > > > >> For me that means that the servlet > retrieves the mbean > > > > >> under the name > jnuke:publicmodules:name=User > > > > >> and invokes the operation register(). > > > > >> > > > > >> 4.When a module is installed and > configured it plug > > > > >> block mbeans in the JMX. > > > > >> > > > > >> C : for blocks, same reasons as above > except 3 and 4 > > > > >> as invocation is typed for 3. > > > > >> > > > > >> D : for themes, same reasons as above > except 3 and 4 > > > > >> as invocation is typed for 3. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> EJB are used for the model : > === message truncated === ___________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français ! Yahoo! Mail : http://fr.mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Take your first step towards giving your online business a competitive advantage. Test-drive a Thawte SSL certificate - our easy online guide will show you how. Click here to get started: http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0027en _______________________________________________ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
