Your input is a large factor as well since I don't really know how different the hibernate 3.1rc2jboss version that was shipped with 4.0.3SP1 and the current version needed for ejb3. The first question, is what do you want bundled in terms of stability/support?
If this is not what is needed for ejb3 then we need to decouple the jbossas build from the ejb3 hibernate dependency and deal with ejb3 as a separate component integrated into the installer with a separate hibernate dependency that replaces/differs from the default/all version. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Steve Ebersole > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 12:11 PM > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0.4 > > It is up to y'all. I am fine with cutting a 3.2 final and > then continuing HEAD development as 3.3. But the 3.2 release > introduced some fairly different behavior in terms of > non-transactional access more in-line with what is defined in > the EJB3 spec. These changes are stricter than what > Hibernate had previously allowed in these scenarios. > I think everyone agrees that these are better behaviors, but > certainly there are probably some users relying on the old > "bad behaviors". > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Scott M Stark > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 1:39 PM > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0.4 > > It seems like ejb3 should only be brining in a latter > hibernate dependency via the installer and a custom build for > testing. The default/all should not be bumped up to track > ejb3 issues to an untested hibernate release. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Dimitris Andreadis > > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 10:54 AM > > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0.4 > > > > > > Exactly. Something stable, that can be tested with > 4.0.4.CR2 (which is > > delayed until Friday 24th or Monday 27th max), that satisfies Bill, > > and won't require an immediate 4.0.4.SP1 release for fixes :) > > > > There are many-many people waiting for 4.0.4 for quite some > time and > > we are already delayed, so please try to get a stable release out. > > Users won't like at all running jboss > > 4.0.4 on a hibernate alpha. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of > > > Bill Burke > > > Sent: 20 March, 2006 20:45 > > > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] 4.0.4 > > > > > > we just need something stable for hibernate in 4.0.4 GA. > > > > > > Steve Ebersole wrote: > > > > Well, its *possible* to have "a final" release whenever > I want ;) > > > > > > > > But at a bare minimum there is one more feature that EJB3 > > > will require > > > > which still needs to be implemented; and it is an ugly one. > > > I need to > > > > release 3.1.3 today/tomorrow (this needs to be done for reasons > > > > extraneous to this discussion). I can then come back to > > > work on this > > > > particular feature. All that I can get done by next week. > > > > > > > > But that is not all I had initially targeted for 3.2 final > > > (nor even > > > > beta). And I do not like leaving off planned features just > > > to get to > > > > a > > > > 3.2 final. > > > > > > > > For me it comes down to whether this is a planned "final > > > release" for > > > > EJB3. If so, I guess I could be persuaded to cut a 3.2 > > final after > > > > implementing the above mentioned feature and then start > > on 3.2.1 or > > > > whatever. > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > > Behalf Of > > > > Dimitris Andreadis > > > > Sent: Monday, March 20, 2006 11:42 AM > > > > To: jboss-development@lists.sourceforge.net > > > > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] 4.0.4 > > > > > > > > > > > > I love those dependencies ;) > > > > > > > > Is it possible to have a final next week ? > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking > scripting language that extends applications into web and > mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime > developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-Development mailing list > JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking > scripting language that extends applications into web and > mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime > developer group breaking into this new coding territory! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-Development mailing list > JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ JBoss-Development mailing list JBoss-Development@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
