Hey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hmm. I like new tech as much as the next geek, but can't help but
> notice that the technologies mentioned for inclusion in jBoss reads
> like a laundry list from Sun's website! Geez, do you really want to
> throw everything in there and increase the hardware requirements
> for a few nifty features?!?
Not quite sure what you're referring to. What of the choices would up
the hardware requirements? The stuff we have going is pretty
lightweight, and hopefully it will stay that way even though the
features offered are not "light-weight".
> Jini looks cool from the admittedly little I've seen. But I'm using
> multicast sockets on a project now in a manner similar to bootp, to
> allow clients and servers to locate each other. Very low overhead
> and it works perfectly.
But Jini is so much more, and it's still pretty lightweight (or at least
it seems to be). We would have to duplicate much of the stuff in there
anyway, so it seems reasonable to use that, which is tried and tested as
well (important point).
Are there any particular aspects about Jini, or the other specs we use,
that you don't like?
/Rickard
--
Rickard �berg
@home: +46 13 177937
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.telkel.com
http://www.ejboss.org
http://www.dreambean.com
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
