[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hmm. I like new tech as much as the next geek, but can't help but
> notice that the technologies mentioned for inclusion in jBoss reads
> like a laundry list from Sun's website! Geez, do you really want to
> throw everything in there and increase the hardware requirements
> for a few nifty features?!?
Yes!
next
> Jini looks cool from the admittedly little I've seen. But I'm using
> multicast sockets on a project now in a manner similar to bootp, to
> allow clients and servers to locate each other. Very low overhead
> and it works perfectly.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, here. Its not meant to be flame-bait. :-P
Then don't tease us and can you GPL-spare that "multicast socket" code?
the idea is that a "new born" JNP client should be able to find his
provider by crying on the network "where is my MOM"?. AFAIK if the
naming is bootp'd then we are all set.
You know the more I design this thing, this WebOS thing, the more I
realize we are reinventing classic UNIX work and utilities in the
web/java world... we should just copy all UNIX the system tools since we
run in them sooner or later.
regards
marc
>
> Russ
>
> >marc fleury wrote:
> >> Yeah that it is a wonderful idea, can't we broadcast instead on all
> >> machine, I feel the port is complicated to do.
> >> Can we broadcast?
> >
> >We're getting a bit ahead of schedule 8-) but the key word is Jini.
> >
> >Mr Joy is a big dreamer. Me like dreamers.
> >
> >/Rickard
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
