> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Rickard Oberg [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet am: Freitag, 20. Oktober 2000 11:54
> An: jBoss
> Betreff: Re: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS
>
[...]
> > 2) Which IP-ports does jBoss listen on (e.g. 1099 for naming, 8082,
> 8083,
> > ... what about the jBoss/RMI counterpart to the CORBA POAManager...)?
>
> 4444 if I remember correctly. Either that or anonymous, i.e. whatever.
> Having an anonymous port is good since it allows several jBoss instances
> to
> live on the same server, which is useful for clustering. Having an
> anonymous
> port is bad since it makes it harder to set up firewalls to let through
> jBoss traffic (will this be common?). This should probably be configurable
> further down the road.
>
I mentioned this problem already in
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03873.html
but I have got no response in that issue
since the 4444 is hardcoded, it is not possible to have two
instances of jboss running on the same machine (without applying my
change)...
gerolf.
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
