> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: marc fleury [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet am: Freitag, 20. Oktober 2000 19:15
> An: jBoss
> Betreff: RE: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS
>
> ok make it configurable and give us a diff, it will go in
>
> amrc
>
well, I just changed one line in
\org\jboss\ejb\plugins\jrmp\server\JRMPContainerInvoker.java (maybe the
constant name 'jrmp.internal.port' should be changed...)
bash-2.02$ diff -w -c JRMPContainerInvoker.java
JRMPContainerInvoker.java.old
*** JRMPContainerInvoker.java Mon Oct 16 09:36:48 2000
--- JRMPContainerInvoker.java.old Fri Oct 06 08:47:40 2000
***************
*** 342,348 ****
new SecureSocketFactory());
*/
!
UnicastRemoteObject.exportObject(this,Integer.getInteger("jrmp.internal.port
",4444).intValue());
GenericProxy.addLocal(container.getBeanMetaData().getJndiName(), this);
InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
--- 342,348 ----
new SecureSocketFactory());
*/
! UnicastRemoteObject.exportObject(this,4444);
GenericProxy.addLocal(container.getBeanMetaData().getJndiName(), this);
InitialContext context = new InitialContext();
gerolf.
> |-----Original Message-----
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scherr Gerolf
> |Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 3:18 AM
> |To: jBoss
> |Subject: AW: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS
> |
> |
> |
> |
> |> -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
> |> Von: Rickard Oberg [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> |> Gesendet am: Freitag, 20. Oktober 2000 11:54
> |> An: jBoss
> |> Betreff: Re: [jBoss-User] jBoss, firewalls & SSL/TLS
> |>
> | [...]
> |
> |> > 2) Which IP-ports does jBoss listen on (e.g. 1099 for naming, 8082,
> |> 8083,
> |> > ... what about the jBoss/RMI counterpart to the CORBA POAManager...)?
> |>
> |> 4444 if I remember correctly. Either that or anonymous, i.e. whatever.
> |> Having an anonymous port is good since it allows several jBoss
> instances
> |> to
> |> live on the same server, which is useful for clustering. Having an
> |> anonymous
> |> port is bad since it makes it harder to set up firewalls to let through
> |> jBoss traffic (will this be common?). This should probably be
> |configurable
> |> further down the road.
> |>
> | I mentioned this problem already in
> |
> |http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg03873.htm
> l
> | but I have got no response in that issue
> |
> | since the 4444 is hardcoded, it is not possible to have two
> |instances of jboss running on the same machine (without applying my
> |change)...
> |
> | gerolf.
>
--
--------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
